Welcome,
Why does this have to be political.
Why are people bringing politics into running.
Can’t this just stay about the sport.
I don’t follow you for politics.
I’ve had my blog for 16 years, and for most of them, I was able to keep politics off the blog. But that’s not where we are now.
I understand the instinct behind that reaction, that running isn’t political, but I also think it depends heavily on whether the systems around you have ever made running feel unsafe, restricted, or conditional.
For a lot of people, running has always required navigating rules, surveillance, fear, or risk that had nothing to do with fitness. That didn’t start with the rise of influencers or people posting opinions. It has always been there.
Right now, we are watching people detained, deported, criminalized, and killed. We are watching laws change who gets medical care, who is protected at work, who is allowed to exist in public without being questioned or targeted. None of that disappears when someone puts on a pair of running shoes.
The simple act of running depends on public space, public safety, time, healthcare, and the assumption that your body moving will not be treated as a threat. Those are political conditions whether or not anyone wants to name them. A few months ago, I wrote an article about someone who trained but almost didn’t run the Chicago Marathon because they were afraid they would be pulled off course. Not everyone has to deal with that.
So when people say running should be apolitical, what they usually mean is that running has never felt political to them personally. That is not the same thing.
Should Influencers Speak Out?
At the same time, I want to be very clear about something that gets muddled online. Influencers are not required to speak out. Having a following does not make someone a journalist or an activist. Some people are not informed enough to speak responsibly. Some are just trying to survive their own lives. Some people could be reprimanded at work for speaking out.
Silence does not automatically tell you everything about a person’s beliefs. Does it usually tell you something? Yes. But it does not always, and that is something I have been working to remember.
It’s also worth naming that not everyone who stays quiet online is doing nothing. Some people are putting real time, money, and risk into work that doesn’t translate to posts or stories. This could be organizing locally, supporting legal funds or showing up in ways that don’t perform well on the internet. Those can be more important than posting on social media.
But following someone is still a choice.
When you follow, like, comment, and engage, you are supporting their platform. I’ve written before about how likes shape influencer culture. That is true even if they never post a single opinion and only share workouts or race photos. Attention is not neutral. It has consequences whether we want it to or not.
If speaking out is important to you, then you should consider who you are following. If that person hasn’t spoken out and you believe it matters, ask yourself this: are you really following someone for who they are, or for the ideal version you want to see?
So if speaking out matters to you, and you notice that someone you follow is consistently silent, you are allowed to decide that this no longer works for you. You can stop giving your attention to something that feels misaligned. You can unfollow, even if you’ve followed for years because when you give attention, whether through likes, follows, or comments, you are directly supporting them. You are supporting the metrics that can lead to brand deals and income.
Running doesn’t become political because someone posts about it. It becomes political when the systems around it decide who gets to move freely, who gets questioned, and who gets punished for existing in public. Ignoring that doesn’t make it go away. It just makes it easier for the people who have never had to think about it.






















